Clive
Turnbull's View On The Kelly Outbreak
source:
C. Turnbull, 'Introduction'
Ned Kelly: Being His Own Story of His Life and Crimes
Hawthorn Press
Melbourne, 1942, pp. 3-5, 8-19.
Ned
Kelly is the best known Australian, our
only folk hero. The explorers, the administrators,
the colonial politicans, are little more than names
on the map. What sort of people they were the average
citizen neither knows nor cares. Men of eminence
nearer to our own day, Farer, Hargrave, Higginbotham,
lack even that memorial. They await a popular substantiation.
In a community whose vista is still cluttered with
the shoddy and the second-rate only one figure is
larger than life-size. It is Kelly, of whose story
not one man, woman or child is wholly ignorant. many
books have been written about Kelly, far more than
about any other Australian.
Two
epical poems relate his deeds. Films have been
made about him, and a radio play, broadcast by
the official stations. The phrase, "Game
as Ned Kelly," is part of the national idiom.
Today, when the Sydney-Melbourne Express is approaching
Glenrowan, staid travellers peer through the
sealed windows and say, "This is the Kelly
country."
Surely
it is a remarkable man who can thus impress himself
upon the national consciousness, who in sixty years
can pass into legend! This man in his lifetime and
after was execrated by those who believed themselves
the guardians of law and order, the custodians of
truth. He was continually vilified. Contemporary
accounts of the Kelly saga are marked both by inconsistency
and falsehood. By officials and others Kelly was
accused of frenzied cruelty, skulking cowardice and
all the mean vices. Yet the people have persisted
in another view. Rightly or wrongly, they have seen
in Kelly those qualities which are deemed the most
desirable in the Australian conception of manhood
-- courage, resolution, independence, loyalty, chivalry,
sympathy with the poor and the ill-used. This is
the Kelly, historical or otherwise, who has now attained
heroic stature, about whom books are still being
written, who has become forever part of the Australian
story, part of the fabric of which we are all built.
Is this the true Kelly?
Turnbull
proceeds to describe and assess Ned's social circumstances,
actions and character...
We
Australians have a large inheritance of rebellious
blood. It is not chance that the only Australian
folk songs are The Wild Colonial Boy and Waltzing
Matilda. The wild colonial boy was himself a bushranger;
and the "jolly" swagman who had the jumbuck
in his tucker-bag is sung of by respectable gentlemen
in Rotary Clubs without apparent realisation that
this song is a reflection of an unending conflict
between the disinherited and the possessors, for,
wherever the sympathy goes in the song, it is certainly
not to the "troopers, one, two, three." So
we may say that, although many of the citizens who
joined in the merrymaking while nominal prisoners
of the Kellys would have scorned to associate themselves
with the business in hand, they were not precisely
upset about it.
If
they were brave men who met Kelly on his own ground,
however, there was a multitude of timid people in
the cities whose fear of Kelly, and what they assumed
Kelly to stand for, was vented in spleen and denigration
unsupported by any worthy witness. Henry Giles Turner,
for instance, speaks of Kelly as a "creature" who
was "for most of his time a poor shabby skulker,
hiding from decent people, distrustful of his own
comrades and relations, gorged and intoxicated one
day, to go hungry for many others..." When the
end came, Turner says, for this "abject" specimen, "it
was with difficulty his spiritual adviser could enable
him to stand erect under the gallows."
Turner, "Fellow
of the Institute of Bankers, London," as he
thought it worth while to say on his title page,
no doubt rightly recognised in Kelly his natural
enemy. Here he has been led into plain untruth. Kelly
was not a skulking creature; subsequent inquiries
discovered such cowardice as there was among those
whose duty it was to apprehend him. Sergeant Steele,
the actual captor of Kelly who brought him down,
much to Ned's disgust, with buckshot, says that kelly "could
easily have escaped had he so desired.... He had
returned in an endeavour to save his companions."
H.
Glenny, J.P., anything but a Kelly sympathiser,
who was present at the execution, says that Kelly
walked along "without the slightest sign
of fear." When the time came "the hangman
then walked across to the cell and pinioned the
prisoner. In two minutes, the doomed man appeared
and walked over to the fatal spot. The white
cap was on the top of his head, and from his
facial appearance, and the want of fear noticeable,
I should say he met his fate boldly enough; not
a shake or a tremour did he give way to." This
statement from a man who regarded Kelly as "a
wretched felon" is surely evidence enough. "Mind
you die like a Kelly, Ned," his mother is
supposed to have said to him. Legend has it that
he said on the scaffold, "Ah well, I suppose
it has come to this," and "Such is
life." The story of a panic-stricken collapse
is a fabrication, just as is the story that Kelly
raved and blasphemed after his capture. He was
a stoic in his fashion; and although he did not
accept death with resignation he accepted it
with dignity.
In
his fashion he was writing out a story that began
long ago, the story of the Little Dark Rose, of the
isle of the hoofprints of young horses. Kelly, a
man born for leadership, of courage and brilliant
organising gifts, living among the poor and the struggling
in a hard country, son of a rebellious Irishman whom
he saw all his days as victim of a stranger's law,
and of an Irish-woman who cherished the old tales:
could this man, being what he was, in these circumstances,
have had any other end? His story has the sweep of
tragedy; and it is the more ironic because many of
those who became involved in it were men of Ireland,
too - Barry, Michael Kennedy, of Westmeath, Thomas
Lonigan, of Sligo, and Michael Scanlan, of Kerry;
and many others who played one part or another, such
as the Inspecting-Superintendent of Police, Sadlier.
His
gifts, I think, were remarkable. Not only his deeds,
but his speeches in the dock and such rude documents
as that now reprinted, go toward proving it. Only
a vigorous and first-class mind could have so asserted
itself with so little of the help that falls to happier
men. No, there is no doubt that Kelly had greatness
in him, let the timid of the time denigrate him how
they will.
Turnbull
concludes his assessment with the following...
Now
it is long since over, and we may look at Kelly without
the agitations of the time, fearing neither that
our horse will be stolen nor that Fenians will have
at us in our beds. Kelly is a folk hero; we cannot
deny it. Is that a good thing? The good that plain
men do, admittedly, is oft interred with their bones;
nevertheless, it is for good things done that uncommon
men are remembered. It is for such actions that we
remember those who have been adjudged criminals in
their day. Popular instinct is right. Ths instinct
has found in Kelly a type of manliness much to be
esteemed -- to reiterate: courage, resolution, independence,
sympathy with the under-dog. The other things are
forgotten. What
might Kelly have become, given opportunity and a
different environment? Such speculation is fruitless.
let us take him for what he was, a bigger man than
those who condemned him and those who hunted him.
But he was out of his time, and was foredoomed; it
would be romantic to pretend otherwise. Because he
was what he was he had to die. Now "the staid
course of sober and impartial justice" desired
of Barry holds sway over all this green and pleasant
land; and yet Jerusalem is not built. Banks and bankers,
poor men and rich, are alike under threat. Has not
Kelly, whose bones not long ago were dragged up out
of their gaolyard by wreckers and seized on by the
mischievous and the young, something to tell us now?
I believe that he has. This man, with all that he
was, and for all that he did, belongs to the true
Australia - not the Australia of the shams and the
money-jugglers, but the Australia that sweats and
suffers and fights, the Australia that, however bewildered,
however betrayed, is, we like to think, still "game
as Ned Kelly." |